Great-Circle vs Rhumb Line Distance Comparison
Compare great-circle and rhumb-line distance and bearing between two coordinates, side by side, for navigation planning.
Inputs
The shortest route and the constant-bearing route between two points on the same sphere — distances, bearings and the extra distance.
Enter the values and press Calculate.
Or load an example to see a worked result.
Batch from CSV
One row per calculation, with a header row. Values use the units currently selected in the form above. Up to 10,000 rows; nothing is uploaded.
How the method works
A fixed worked example to explain the method — it is not your result.
Before you rely on this: First-pass guide only. Verify safety-critical or regulated work against the relevant standards, your project requirements and a qualified professional.
How to use this calculator
- Enter both points' latitude and longitude.
- Choose the rhumb direction: the shorter way round (default), or eastward or westward.
- Optionally change the sphere radius, or add the WGS84 geodesic as a separate reference.
- Press Calculate and compare the two routes, their bearings and the extra distance.
How it works
Great circle: the shortest route on the sphere, d = R·c, with the central angle from the stable atan2 form. Its heading changes along the way, so it has an initial and a final bearing.
Rhumb line: one constant bearing. Δψ = ln(tan(π/4 + φ₂/2) / tan(π/4 + φ₁/2)), q = Δφ/Δψ (or cos φ on an east–west line), d = R·√(Δφ² + q²Δλ²), with Δλ wrapped to the chosen direction.
Extra percentage = (rhumb − great circle) / great circle × 100. A rhumb line is never shorter on the same sphere; the two are equal along the equator and along meridians.
At a pole the longitude is undefined, so the only rhumb line is the meridian — the tool says so instead of returning an infinite value.
Worked example
New York (40.6°, −73.8°) → London (51.6°, −0.5°). Great circle 5,536.892 km starting at 51.17° and arriving on 107.78°; rhumb line 5,755.565 km on a constant 77.73° — 218.7 km (3.95%) longer. The WGS84 geodesic, shown separately, is 5,551.759 km.
Common mistakes
- Comparing a spherical great circle with an ellipsoidal distance and calling the gap a route difference. Compare routes on the same sphere first.
- Steering the great circle's initial bearing all the way — it changes continuously.
- Going the long way round across the date line. The default takes the shorter crossing; choose a direction to force the other.
Frequently asked questions
Which should I use for navigation?
Great circle is shortest; rhumb line is simpler to follow with a constant heading. Long ocean/air routes use great circles split into rhumb-line legs.
Related tools
- Haversine Great-Circle Distance Calculator
- Vincenty Ellipsoidal Distance Calculator
- ECEF X/Y/Z to Lat/Long/Height Converter
- Lat/Long to UTM Converter (WGS84)
- Lat/Long/Height to ECEF Converter
- UTM to Lat/Long Converter
Explore more in Surveying, Coordinates, GIS & CAD.
Cite this tool
Zerdly. (2026). Great-Circle vs Rhumb Line Distance Comparison. Retrieved from https://www.zerdly.com/tools/great-circle-vs-rhumb-line-distance-comparison/
Tip: Enter any known values to calculate the remaining results.
Designed to run locally in your browser. Tool inputs are not intentionally stored by Zerdly unless stated otherwise.



